Written on December 10, 2009 by admin
Filed Under: marketing
Yahoo (moves toward the little blue bird, the center of attention at the party): Well, hello there, baby. You sure are popular here.
Twitter (BIG SMILE): Yep! And I have #friends @overthere and @overthere and—
Yahoo (slips an arm around the bird): How would you like to come back to my place for a little . . . integration?
Twitter: Whoa, buddy—this is why I carry an API at all times!
Back in July, Twitter was popping up everywhere: first a deal with Bing, then a deal with Google. Not to be left out, Yahoo made a real-time foray with OneRiot, but apparently they still had their eyes on the life of the party: Twitter.
Last month, Yahoo News integrated Twitter into its results for breaking news via a tabbed shortcut:

Apparently this went well, because now more of these Tweet results will be directly integrated into the SERPs—and they just might be doing this right:

However, Yahoo won’t be adding Twitter to all its results. According to the Yahoo Search blog,
So how does this work? We continuously keep track of queries searched on Yahoo!, and when there is a spike in interest in a topic, our search algorithm selects relevant tweets to show on the search results page, either as a part of the Yahoo! News shortcut or in a Twitter section, like in the examples above. The age of the tweets will vary – some will be a minute old, while others may be hours old. Our goal is to feature interesting Twitter content that is relevant to your query and complements the other results you find on the search page.
And if they do that, that might be just the way to integrate Twitter into SERPs: filtered for relevance, used only for topics generating a lot of discussion, and sequestered in a section of the SERP.
What do you think? Is this too little, too late for Yahoo? Or is this more than you want to see of Twitter in your SERPs?



Here is the original post:
Yahoo Moving in on Twitter
Tags: a-deal-with ,a-minute-old ,and-complements ,around-the-bird ,into-the-serps ,marketing ,party ,search ,serps ,social ,tabbed-shortcut ,twitter ,yahoo-twitter
No Comments
Written on November 17, 2009 by admin
Filed Under: Advertising, book, marketing, seo
I noticed someone using Google suggest in another story today (honestly forgot where) and thought I’d see what Google “thinks” about social media. Then I tried SEO. Not surprising. Funniest of all, considering Google’s business model, was advertising.

Pretty telling when you think about it. Of course this isn’t what Google “really thinks” about social media, it’s Google’s response to search queries and effort to predict what we’re really searching for. Google Suggest works by drawing from searches by other Google users, sites in Google’s search index, and ads in the Google advertising network. If you’re logged in, Google will use your search history to make suggestions. But, that’s not as interesting as viewing these screen shots as what “Google thinks”, so let’s continue.

Whoah, let’s turn off the SEO hate, OK Google? In case you’re not a hater and curious about search engine optimization, find the truth about SEO here and why ongoing SEO is important here.

After typing in “advertising is” on Google, I had to laugh because of such positive sentiment. How many millions of dollars, no billions of dollars, go into advertising that is untracked, unaccountable? Google’s bread and butter is advertising so there’s more than just a bit of irony going on here. However, the kind of advertising that Google sells IS trackable and VERY accountable. No wonder Google Suggest says “advertising is good for you”.
What does Google Suggest think of your industry?
Written on October 20, 2009 by admin
Filed Under: marketing
There’s a problem brewing that involves Google and election mud-slinging.
Ooh, I just heard a collective “I knew it” from political conspiracy theorists around the country, but it’s not quite what you think. The problem involves the mandated disclaimer often needed for any kind of political ad.
You know the kind: “This ad was paid for by the party to elect Michael Scott mayor of Scranton.”
The issue under discussion is, how do you fit such a long disclaimer on a Google AdWords ad? In his recent campaign for mayor of St. Petersburg, Fla., Scott Wagman bought such an ad and was fined for lack of disclaimer.
He was hardly the first to employ the tactic, which didn’t stop a rival campaign from complaining the ad did not have a “paid for by” disclaimer. The Florida Elections Commission ordered Wagman to remove it and pay a $250 fine, even though the required disclaimer was longer than the 68 characters allowed in the text of the ad, which wasn’t “paid for” until someone clicked on it.
Now political eggheads and pencil pushers around the country are trying to figure out if Google ads need such a disclaimer, or do they fall within the realm of buttons and bumper-stickers–which require no such wording.
I’d say they have about 2 years left to figure this out. Search spending showed improved usage numbers during the 2008 presidential election, and I suspect that trend will continue as we get closer to the 2012.
My solution?
Simply ensure the landing page has the disclaimer. After all, the ad hasn’t technically been “paid for” by anyone, until you click the ad and visit the landing page. But that might just be too simple of a solution for politicians.



See the original post:
Warning! That Political Ad on Google Could Cost You a $250 Fine!
Tags: country ,disclaimer ,google ,google-product ,improved-usage ,legal ,michael-scott ,mobile-phone ,numbers-during ,party ,phone ,potential ,remove-it-and ,required ,site
No Comments
Written on October 13, 2009 by admin
Filed Under: book, marketing
A free pass on what you ask? Well, a free pass on the partnership of Microbing and Yahoo as it morphs into Microbingahoo to provide search from bing that will be sold by Yahoo that will make the online world a better place because of competition. You remember that one, right?
Funny how we forget about the big news of the summer when there is no speculation or guessing whether it would or wouldn’t happen and if it did what it would look like. Well, we wouldn’t want this to go 18-24 months without a little Google induced drama now, would we?
Enter Google’s presence in Washington, DC. Of course, they align their firepower in the political arena for just such occasions. It’s only fair since Microsoft (and Yahoo too?) have their folks in the capitol to ‘fight for their right to partner’ (insert lyrics into Beastie Boys song “You Gotta Fight for Your Right to Party” – we may have an underground hit).
AdAge tells us of the behind the scenes activity
The Mountain View, Calif.-based giant hasn’t taken an official position on the proposed deal, but it is quietly disseminating a view to regulators, politicians, analysts and journalists: that the need for scale is not a valid case for approving Microsoft’s search deal with Yahoo.
This, of course, is the core argument in favor of the deal: that Microsoft and Yahoo cannot compete effectively against Google in search on their own and that their deal would make the search market itself more competitive.
This kind of action is no surprise. In fact, I have been wondering when the fireworks would begin. While it appears as if there will be little to truly get in the way of regulatory approval of this partnership you would have to expect this gamesmanship from Google. If for nothing else, to get some publicity and make a public case before they will appear to be magnanimous enough to let the partnership happen. Why would they let it happen without much of a fight other than for show? I suspect it would be supreme confidence that they will crush the new Micro – whatever no matter what form or name it takes.
Google is busy with other issues, as well, like its book settlement so this is just part of their day to day activities in DC. Depending on the source, their level of engagement varies.
Another executive close to the process described Google as “actively” lobbying against the deal, but Google said it is just responding to a Justice Department requests for its opinion.
There are many angles to this an honestly the AdAge Article does a real nice job of laying out the issues around scale and pricing power that are at the core of the arguments both for and against the partnership.
So we at Marketing Pilgrim say “Let the he said, she said begin!” After it’s all said and done what will this look like and will any of these efforts serve to do anything other than keep brands in the news? Not likely. What will really be interesting is if any of this effort from Microsoft and Yahoo will truly put a dent in ‘The Goog’ at all.



Go here to read the rest:
Will Google Give Microhoo a Free Pass?
Tags: a-fight-other ,book ,deal ,marketing ,mountain ,news ,online ,partnership ,party ,right ,search ,summer
No Comments
Written on September 8, 2009 by admin
Filed Under: Object, book, seo
Posted by audiore
This post was originally in YOUmoz, and was promoted to the main blog because it provides great value and interest to our community. The author’s views are entirely his or her own and may not reflect the views of SEOmoz, Inc.
Audiore is an in-house internet marketer for Bill4Time - a time billing company.
Ok, fellow SEOmozzers, this is my very first YouMoz post and I’m pretty nervous about it. It’s just like songwriting where you compose something from your personal perspective and cringe a bit as you put it out there for everyone to see. (And if any of you are even thinking about checking to see if I know what I’m talking about, let’s make it easy for you.)
Now, this post is coming from someone who is not much of a socialite butterfly. I admit, I procrastinated 30 minutes before I gathered enough courage to get in the door.
Tags: business ,events ,friends ,movies ,networking ,opinion ,party ,people ,person ,personal ,presentations ,seo ,shoes ,street ,wedding
No Comments
Written on July 29, 2009 by admin
Filed Under: book, chat, marketing, seo, stuntdubl
Since I am incredibly lazy - here are the details from the auction for the last SEOktoberfest golden ticket copy and pasted. I do agree with Greg’s assessment of why Rebecca should attend, and will add that I’m expecting it to be a lot like Bavarian Festival in Frankenmuth, Michigan, except 10,000% larger and more rowdy…which may remind Rebecca of home if she was from Frankenmuth (but she’s not), though she IS from Michigan, and I will need some representation from another Michigander to remind me where to get booze when there are no “party stores” around. That is all for the mindless blathering on this post - just go to the damn auction so you can join us. I’m sure the event will be epic.
The original ticket price is 5.000 euros, and the 15 tickets were sold out after only 20 minutes!
15 International Online-Marketing Experts, 15 Attendees, and 10 former Playmates - one conference - one big Party!
Here´s what´s happening at SEOktoberfest:
Tuesday, 22nd of September:
10 a.m - 4 p.m. - SEOktoberfest Conference
4 p.m. - 10 p.m. - Oktoberfest at famous Käfer Wiesn-Schnänke
open end - After Party at P1 Club
Wednesday, 23rd of September:
11 a.m. - 8 p.m. - We got a whole luxurious Spa completly rented out for everybody. 6 massage therapists etc. will get you fit again!
8 p.m. - open end - Friends & Family Dinner at Munich´s No.1 Wine-Restaurant Die blaue Donau
Thursday, 24th of September
10 a.m. - 4 p.m. - SEOktoberfest Conference
4. p.m. - 10 p.m. - Oktoberfest at Schützen-Festhalle
open end - After Party at a secret location
What´s included in the price?
Everything!
Every Attendee gets a whole Oktoberfest Outfit - Shoes, Lederhosen, Shirt etc., and everything you eat and / or drink, as well as all the transfers etc. - everything´s included!
Who are the Online Marketing Experts?
* Todd Malicoat
* Chris Winfield
* Bob Rains
* Johannes Beus
* Brent Csutoras
* Sickness
* RSnake
* Greg Boser
* Barbara Boser
* Todd Friesen
* Marcus Tandler
* Quadszilla
* Frank Watson
The proceeds from this charity auction go to the AMAZONICA Foundation!
The rest is here:
Last Ticket to SEOktoberfest on Ebay
|